U.S. launches new strikes and Trump threatens ‘massive attack’ as Iran widens war
The United States conducted its 13th consecutive night of military strikes against Iranian targets as regional tensions continue to impact global trade routes. President Donald Trump indicated he is weighing a significant new response, citing a desire to exert more pressure on Tehran after recent attacks on shipping vessels. These strikes follow a series of actions by Iran and its proxies, including the Houthi movement, which have threatened oil tankers in both the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea.
Energy markets reacted sharply to the instability, with Brent crude prices briefly exceeding $100 per barrel on Thursday. While prices later stabilized near $97, the potential for further disruption remains a primary concern for international markets. Reports indicate that maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz has slowed significantly, forcing energy companies to reassess their logistics in the region.
Military command centers, drone storage facilities, and communication networks were the primary focus of the latest U.S. operations. Tehran responded by claiming strikes against U.S.-linked infrastructure in Kuwait, Bahrain, and Iraq. State media in Iran reported casualties in Ahvaz, though official details on the full scope of damage from these exchanges remain difficult to verify.
Diplomatic efforts appear to be at an impasse. Senior Arab officials expressed concern over the lack of a clear path toward de-escalation, noting that the ongoing conflict shows few signs of resolution. Despite the current standoff, some movement was noted as the Iraqi Prime Minister traveled to Tehran for discussions, though President Trump maintained that the current situation requires more pressure before substantive negotiations can begin.
As the situation develops, the focus remains on the security of global energy chokepoints. The administration has signaled it may use frozen Iranian assets to cover damages caused to commercial vessels. Tehran has criticized this stance, warning that such measures set a precedent for the global financial system.