The Google Pixel Watch 5 has arrived, but it brings a familiar design and a higher price tag. Many users are finding the hardware changes between this model and the previous generation limited, prompting questions about whether the upgrade is worth the investment. With rising costs for new hardware in 2026, it is worth looking at other options that offer equal or better performance for your money.
The Google Pixel Watch 4 remains a top competitor. It shares nearly identical dimensions, battery life, and sensor performance with the newer model while often costing less. It continues to receive software support and provides access to core health and fitness tracking tools, making it a logical choice for those who want a capable Wear OS experience without paying the premium for the latest launch.
For those open to brands beyond Google, the Samsung Galaxy Watch 9 stands out. It incorporates the Snapdragon Wear Elite platform, which promises significant improvements in CPU and GPU performance compared to the hardware inside the Pixel Watch 5. It also features a more modern sapphire crystal display and a larger battery in the 40mm model, providing a hardware package that feels better equipped for future software demands.
If your primary focus is fitness, dedicated sport watches offer advantages that mainstream smartwatches often lack. The Amazfit Balance 3 provides battery life lasting up to 21 days and specialized training metrics for competitive events like HYROX. Similarly, the COROS PACE 4 targets runners with a lightweight design, dual-band GPS, and extensive training analytics, all while lasting nearly three weeks on a single charge.
Evaluating your specific needs is the best way to determine your next smartwatch. Whether you prioritize deep integration with the Google ecosystem, future-proof processing power, or specialized athletic data, there are clear alternatives to the Pixel Watch 5. Comparing these specifications helps ensure you select a device that matches your usage patterns and budget.